Election 2020 (Part 3): An Appeal to Christians on Both Sides of the Political Aisle–Political Idolatry and the Beast (and what Christians need to do to resist it)

Here we are, a day before the 2020 presidential election, and I want to give a few final thoughts to wrap up my two previous posts. Call it a “Christian response to our politics,” if you will. In particular, this post really is addressed to Christians more than anyone else.

I want to first say that it should be no surprise that true Christians can differ in their political views. Throughout my entire life, I’ve known Christians who are more liberal and Christians who are more conservative—Christians who usually vote Democrat and Christians who usually vote Republican. I grew up within the Evangelicalism of the 80s-90s, and even though my family tended to be more politically conservative, it was always disturbing to see that throughout that time of the rise of the “Moral Majority” and the “Religious Right” that much of conservative Evangelicalism committed the sin of mistaking the GOP party platform for the Kingdom of God. It always came down to one issue, and one issue alone—abortion. Thus, the result was that for many conservative Evangelicals, presidential elections took on the trappings of a religious crusade, where all Democrats were godless, immoral secularists. I mean, how on earth could a Christian vote for Bill Clinton? A presidential candidate’s personal morality, along with his commitment to end abortion—were the only things that mattered, it seemed, in the Evangelical world.

That was essentially how Evangelicalism got radically politicized. To be a “true Christian” was to vote Republican—at least that was the strong implication. But there is something inherently wrong with that kind of thinking, and over time, when that sort of politicization happens, the Christian faith becomes indistinguishable from partisan party politics. Needless to say, it eventually turns people off. That is one reason why so many people have left Evangelicalism and have become so disgusted and disillusioned with it. Like I said, even though I grew up in Evangelicalism and have always been more conservative in my political views, I never liked it when Evangelicals blurred the line between Christianity and politics.

Sadly, though, especially over these past few years, I’ve seen this exact same mentality and politicization happening among many ex-Evangelicals who now consider themselves Christian progressives. They have the exact same mindset but are just one the opposite end of the political spectrum. Instead of saying, “How can a real Christian vote for a Democrat?” it is now, “How can a real Christian vote for a Republican?” And if you disagree with them politically, they seek to slander you in the same kind of way “Moral Majority” Evangelicals slandered any Christian who voted for a Democrat in the 80s-90s. Ex-Evangelicals have accused me of having “fascist sympathies” because I have said Antifa’s rioting is a bad thing. I’ve been accused of being racist and “praising Robert E. Lee” because, even though I said I would like Confederate monuments taken down in a proper, legal way, I was not for vigilante mobs just ripping them down. I’ve been accused of being a woman-hating sexist because I joked about the fact that Elizabeth Warren really isn’t native American.

That kind of mentality, whether it comes from Christian conservatives, Christian progressives, or ex-Evangelicals is poison, plain and simple. Now, I want to see Christians in both parties, not only being the conscience of each party, but also being examples on how to conduct oneself and bear Christ’s image within an imperfect country and imperfect political system that, for all its faults, has done a pretty good job over the past 250 years. I want to see Christians in both parties be the ones who will make principled stances on Christian values, even if they disagree with other Christians on the precise way to best reflect those values. I want to see Christians be honest enough to call out the sins and the sleaze that happen within their preferred party. And I want to see Christians, regardless of their political leanings and choices, be the ones to stand up and insist that one still respect people who differ in their political views.

Sadly, though, I don’t see that kind of thing happening in our public discourse. In I Corinthians, the Apostle Paul chastised the Corinthian believers because they were aligning with different leaders and forgetting that Christ was Lord of all. The result was that there were deep divisions arising in that church, and so Paul had to address it, rather harshly at times. Although the situation and culture has changed, I think a lot of similarities can be seen between that first century Corinthian church and the modern American political climate so many Christians find themselves in. Why is that?

To get right to the point, I think modern American politics has effectively become the real religion of most people—and sadly, this includes many Christians. It is political idolatry, plain and simple. And, with all kinds of idolatry (or ideology), any deviation from the cult is seen as a threat that must be attacked and crushed. And why? Because deep down, we know idols are false. Idols are all image with no life in them. Idols crumble and fail. We know this deep down, but man, they look so pretty, they give us the illusion of safety and security. They tell us we are the ones who are right and everyone else is wrong—and that kind of bigotry makes us feel good.

But the fact is the worshipping of idols—those images that have eyes and ears and mouths, but that cannot really see or hear or speak the truth—inevitably turns their worshippers into like the things they worship. You become like the thing you worship. Worship God, in whose image you are made, and you become a true human being who can see, hear, and speak God’s truth. Worship and idol—in this case a political image—and you become a political animal that is blind and deaf to the truth, and that is ruled by its beast-like instincts and that can’t speak an intelligible word, only snarls, grunts, and howls against anything you deem a threat.

Christians shouldn’t conduct themselves in that way. But politics are seductive and play upon our biases and fears—and therefore it is really easy to get sucked into that kind of political idolatry that is nothing more than a cult of personality reinforced by propaganda from any array of talking heads on social media. Don’t kid yourself, though, it is ultimately nothing short of beast-like, and Christians are called to resist that kind of beast.

The Dragon and the Beast from the Sea (Rev. 13)

Of course, the beast of Revelation was seen as the Roman emperor, the monarch of the known world. His identity was clear. Here in America, though, there is no monarchy. Our republic has set up a system where the people vote for their chief executive every four years, which, along with our three branches of government, acts as a safeguard against any kind of authoritarian, beast-like ruler from gaining total power. To continue my allusion to Revelation, though, I’m convinced that the dragon, the power behind the beast, is a pretty crafty himself, and, if he can’t call a solitary beast-like ruler from the sea, he can certainly corrupt things so that even a system set up to prevent the rise of a beast can, in and of itself, become a beast-like system.

This calls for wisdom, especially on the part of Christians. We should realize that there is always the danger, no matter the political system, of that system becoming corrupted and devolving into some sort of totalitarianism. Not necessarily a hard totalitarianism of an authoritarian dictator (like Hitler, Stalin, or Mao), but more of a soft totalitarianism, where, for the sake off feeling safe, voters just accept the status quo, where politicians play the election game, say the right things to get elected, but then once in office never really get anything done. That kind of political charade can take on the characteristics of the beast in its own way.

We should always vote for the politicians we think best, but we should always retain a certain amount of suspicion and demand accountability at all times. Bill Belichick, the coach of the New England Patriots, is famous for a certain mantra he always hammers into his players: “Do your job.” If each player does his job, then the team works together, and they succeed. If a player doesn’t, though, that player won’t be around for too long. That, I propose, is how we should view our politicians, be it the president, a senator, or a congressman. We should view them as our employees, and we should constantly demand that they do their job.

But those who succumb to the temptation of political idolatry—something that the very political system and political propaganda are constantly tempting us to do—their chosen candidates are elevated to something more that the employees of America. We just want them to look good and say the right things in their speeches so that we feel safe. If they do that, we as a voting public will keep voting the same people in time after time, even though they don’t do their jobs. And because of their inaction, the bureaucracy becomes yet another incarnation of the beast—a lazy and gluttonous beast whom we feed with our votes and whose inaction results in the crushed lives of the poor and needy. This isn’t a “GOP vs. Democrat” thing by the way. For decades the middle class, working class, minority communities have been decimated because of the lazy political actions of politicians—GOP and Democrats alike. Yet nothing of substance really ever gets addressed.

As shocked as I was at the 2016 election, I was even more shocked to see just how “beast-like” our government bureaucracy was. Again, I had no love for Trump, but (as I laid out in Part 2) the actions that have unfolded over the past four years have shocked me even more. The beast doesn’t like to be poked, and let’s face it, the only one brazen enough to poke a beast is bound to be somewhat of a $%#$@%. In any case, I came to see that the beast isn’t really just the government bureaucracy—it is us, the voting public. We are the ones who keep voting in politicians who prove to be spineless and ineffective. It is no wonder that Trump is such an offense, not just to Washington DC, but to so many Americans. We as a body politic are suffering from a political cancer and have taken on some of the characteristics of the beast because we have allowed ourselves to become political idolaters. We have started to be come like the partisan politics we worship. We are wild elephants and wild asses. It is obvious to everyone on social media.

Now, it is true that there are political idolaters on “the Right” who think Trump is the messiah. By the same token, there are political idolaters on “the Left” who are convinced he is the anti-Christ who is a threat to their own political messiah. They’re both wrong. The way I see it, Trump is chemotherapy and our body politic is suffering from cancer. Nobody likes chemo—chemo kills all the cells it touches. But the hope is that in the process, it gets all the cancer, so that the surviving good cells can recover. Sadly, I don’t think the cancer is gone. I think more rounds of chemo are necessary. At least, that is how I see things at the present time.

And that brings me back (in a roundabout way) to my original point. Don’t be fooled into thinking electing Trump OR Biden is going to be the magic pill that makes everything better. There are bigger societal and cultural challenges that cannot be fixed by politics. They will only be able to be solved if we stop our political idolatry, take a look at ourselves, and realize that we are much of the problem. Poisonous and hateful rhetoric isn’t just coming from Trump’s Twitter-feed. It’s everywhere…and Christians, both conservatives and progressives, have let their tongues become a raging fire (James 3:1-12). We need to set an example to everyone by taming our own tongues, especially in light of the inevitable post-election madness that is bound to happen.

It begins by making a point to respect the decisions of people who don’t vote the way you do. Yes, that can be a challenge, especially when people don’t show that respect to you. Here’s how I see it though: If you honestly agree with Joe Biden’s proposals and if you just do not agree with (or like!) Trump, then vote for Biden—I’m not going to think any less of you. That is how our democracy works. And if I make the decision to vote for Trump (and I’ve given my reasons in these posts), I expect you to not think any less of me. If either one of us starts calling the other person a Commie, a Socialist-loving baby-killer, or a fascist, misogynistic racist—let’s take that as a clear sign that the one who utters that garbage is a political idolater who is reflecting the image of the beast.

At the same time, we all know that there will be some who vote for Biden because they really do think Trump is worse than Joseph Stalin, and there will be some who vote for Trump because they are convinced that Biden is involved in the Satanic pedophilia ring that QAnon is helping to expose. Let’s not engage with such nutjobs. Let’s not project the worst and most insane of the other side of the political aisle onto honest, sincere voters who simply don’t vote the same way we do. Let’s vote our conscience, let’s be able to articulate clear reasons for our decisions, and let’s then hold whomever we vote for accountable by insisting that they do their job.

I’m sorry if this post was a bit rambling, but it’s been tumbling around in my mind this election season. I just wanted to share it. Now, hold onto your hats…chances are the rest of November is going to get bumpy, so steer clear of any stampeding beasts.

14 Comments

  1. I think much of the conflict over political candidates boils down to two issues:

    1. What is more important? Personality or Policy? Can a Christian vote for a person whose personality does not reflect Jesus? Can a Christian vote for a person whose policies do not reflect Jesus? Some think the answer to both questions is No, so not seeing Jesus on the ballot, they simply don’t vote. Others will say something like we’re not voting for Messiah-in-Chief, we’re voting for President. This will always be a flawed person, so we have to mostly look at policy. Others can’t get past the personality. So, division brews.

    2. Related to policy is the question, Should Christian charity be a matter of government policy or should it be a strictly personal decision. Some will say that “charity” that is coerced via taxes is not really charity since it is not freely given from the heart. These people will oppose laws that force people to help others through taxes. Others will say that helping through taxes is just We the People showing who we are in the form of public policy. They will support their taxes being used to help people. These differences put people at odds as the voluntary charity crowd accuses the other side of being for theft of citizens money and not allowing them to fund the charities of their choice, but rather forced to support what the government wants funded. The taxes crowd accuses the other side of being cold-hearted and selfish, wanting to keep their wealth for themselves. In reality, most on both side want to help the needy, they just have different ideas about what’s the most moral and best way of accomplishing that goal.

  2. I recall going to a Christian Men’s Retreat before Reagan was elected that invited men from various local churches. On Sunday, they ended the official meeting early in order to have an “optional” meeting in the same location. I had car pooled and I could see that my car pool group was staying, so I was stuck and just went along with it but was suspicious. The speaker was a new guy that I had not seen before at the Retreat. His hour long talk consisted of 2 main points:

    1) A (true) Christian had to vote for Reagan.
    2) A (true) Christian was forbidden oral sex.

    I thought it was very strange to mix these 2 ideas in one talk, but there it was and was obviously quasi-endorsed but with explicit plausible deniability by the sponsors of the Retreat.

  3. Like many a good sermon, your post rambles a little and carries a good message, in a gracious manner. The audience can hear you instead of plugging their ears. You are calling us to do the truly right thing. Thank you!

  4. A group of christians in my small town gathered at the local church and prayed for all the candidates in the election today. We prayed that God would bless whoever it is that will be voted in. It was a great prayer meeting because I know many of my brothers and sisters will vote differently than I will but we all love and respect one another. We also prayed that there would be peace after the results are in, and as followers of Christ who is the Prince of Peace, we can do no less.

  5. “Beast-like” government bureaucracy…which one? Which Government, Federal, State, County, City? I still believe we can actually have good Government and good bureaucracy’s that work for a majority of our Citizens and that includes you Joel. Thanks for sharing and the struggle will continue whoever is declared victor. The struggle continues for both good Churches and good Government. Unfortunately right now we have some very powerful folks (financially and philosophically) who could cares less for either. But then, both Church and State have been under this dynamic since the beginning, and now as in the beginning we need level headed expositors who can reveal problems with both. Keep up the good fight. But again, “Beast-like” government bureaucracy…which one?

    1. I was referring mostly to the Federal government. And my point is that it can easily become more “beast-like” if we allow it to become entrenched. I think that individually, most politicians in Congress, SCOTUS, and Presidency are nice people. But the bureaucracy easily takes a life of its own. For example, both Dems and Repubs have ALWAYS talked about immigration reform, and even though both sides seem to agree on 75% of what needs to be done, it never is addressed. Why? I don’t have a good answer. But that failure to address big problems does result in a lot of the “poor and needy” getting hurt.

      1. Bureaucracy has always had a great deal of inertia. I’m not sure of how to ever really get around that especially in policy heavy areas that have to draw on so many different parts. Certainly authoritarian regimes are far better at that, but I don’t think we want to see that either.

      2. Which is why I’ve never understood people who argue that we need an even bigger federal government.

        IMHO, the bigger the government, the bigger the chance for it to tyrannize and oppress its citizens, or at least to maintain the status quo and never really get anything done.

        Though John in Revelation had the Roman Empire in mind specifically, I think what Revelation says about Rome can apply to any human system of government that gets out of hand and essentially sets itself up as God.

        Elder David Lipscomb (1831-1917), a hugely influential leader in Christian Churches/Churches of Christ and editor of the equally hugely influential *Gospel Advocate* magazine became convinced during the American Civil War that all human governments were usurpations of God’s divine government, partly because they used force, coercion and war to further their aims–as in the Civil War. In 1889 he compiled and edited a series of editorials he’d written denouncing the Civil War and human governments into a book titled *Civil Government* (which you can buy on Amazon). Lipscomb counseled those in his communion of churches to stay out of politics, not to even vote. Pay your taxes and respect the civil authorities, as they govern at God’s will, but if you’re a Christian don’t have anything to do with government not even to vote. God’s kingdom and its government would come to earth through the death, and resurrection of the Messiah Jesus, indeed had already broken into the world, though won’t be fully inaugurated until the second coming and the new creation.

        I confess that during this election more than once I wondered whether Lipscomb wasn’t right. I voted, but for the first time in my life I actually debated voting. That I did decide to vote I owe at least partly to Dr. Anderson’s three blogs on the election. That and prayer.

        Pax.

        Lee.

      1. George MacDonald

        Creeping Christians

        We are and remain such creeping Christians, because we look at ourselves and not at Christ; because we gaze at the marks of our own soiled feet, and the trail of our own defiled garments…Each, putting his foot in the footprint of the Master, and defacing it, turns to examine how far his neighbor’s footprint corresponds with that which he stills calls his Master’s although it is but his own. Or, having committed a petty fault, I mean a fault such as only a petty creature could commit, we mourn over the defilement to ourselves, and the shame of it before our friends, children, or servants, instead of hastening to make due confession and amends to our fellow, and then, forgetting our own paltry self with its well earned disgrace, lift our eyes to the glory which alone will quicken the true man us, and kill the peddling creature we so wrongly call our self. (George MacDonald mentor to C.S. Lewis)

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.