Larycia Hawkins, Wheaton College, Muslims, Evolution, and Politics (Part 1)

Over the past month, the story of Lacycia Hawkins has gained national attention. She is the tenured professor at Wheaton College, a prominent Evangelical college, who announced on Facebook in December that she was going to wear a hajib for month over Christmas to show her love and support for her Muslim neighbor. Wheaton College…

Continue reading →

Sam Harris and “The End of Faith”: Conclusion 10:2

Sam Harris perhaps represents the most dangerous form of atheism. It is inflammatory, irrational, hostile, and missionary. He is not content to “let the facts speak for themselves,” and let people come to their own conclusions. Harris feels he needs to tell you what to think and believe. If you don’t believe me, consider what…

Continue reading →

Sam Harris and “The End of Faith”: Conclusion–Part 10:1

Now we come to the conclusion of my critique of Sam Harris’s book, The End of Faith. What I have attempted to show in this detailed analysis is the following: Harris holds to a false dichotomy that “faith” and “reason” are polar opposites. Harris’ portrayal of “religion” is grossly biased. He cherry-picks isolated events and…

Continue reading →

Ken Ham and Bryan College…and that Evil Evil Secular Media that Just Distorts Everything!

Today, I’d like to share a short response to one of Ken Ham’s blog from a couple of years ago. This response has not made it into the book I am writing, but it still is worthwhile to read. It involves the controversy over evolution and the historicity of Adam and Eve that erupted at…

Continue reading →

Sam Harris and “The End of Faith”: Scientific Spirituality and a Hopeless Contradiction (Part 9)

Sam Harris’ final chapter in The End of Faith is entitled, “Experiments in Consciousness.” In light of the basic premise of his book (i.e. faith is destructive and irrational, and needs to come to an end), it will surprise the reader to find that Harris essentially advocates for eastern meditation and religious practices, all the…

Continue reading →

Sam Harris and “The End of Faith”: A Science of Good and Evil? (Part 8:2)

Yesterday, I began to look at Sam Harris’ attempt to root morality within the field of science. Needless to say, such a claim is highly problematic. As I should in yesterday’s post, not only does Harris acknowledge the problem, he also proves himself unable to resolve it. Today, I wish to conclude my comments on…

Continue reading →

Sam Harris and “The End of Faith”: Can Science be the Basis of Morality? (Part 8:1)

Despite his attacks on religion and “faith,” atheist Sam Harris nevertheless holds to his own presuppositional faith in “science,” namely that there can be a “scientific basis” for morality. Simply put, morality is not a matter of ethics, it is a matter of science. He writes, “Many people appear to believe that ethical truths are…

Continue reading →

Ken Ham, Virgins, and the Shutting of Doors (Part 2)

In yesterday’s post, I addressed Ken Ham’s use of the Parable of the Ten Virgins in Matthew 25, and his claim that Christian pastors and academics who don’t support his young earth creationism were not only like the “five foolish virgins,” but were, in fact, false prophets. I gave a brief overview of Matthew 21-27,…

Continue reading →

Ken Ham’s Fascination with Virgins, Doors, and His Propensity to Shut Them–Part 1 (Plus a Brief Overview of Matthew 21-27 that will Blow You Away)

By all means, please like this post, and please share it! A couple of days ago, Ken Ham re-tweeted a previous post he had written back on March 19, 2012: “The Door’s Still Open.” On one hand, nothing he said was particularly new for Ken Ham. On the other hand, what he said made me…

Continue reading →

Sam Harris and “The End of Faith”: Let’s Get Reasonable about Religion, the Death Penalty, Drugs and Sex (Part 7)

At the very beginning of his book, Sam Harris makes this very true statement: “Your beliefs define your vision of the world; they dictate your behavior; they determine your emotional responses to other human beings” (12). He is completely correct here—one’s beliefs do indeed define one’s vision of the world. Francis Schaeffer calls this “presuppositional apologetics”—namely, one…

Continue reading →